A U.S. District Court on Thursday upheld a Bush-era decision that polar bears are a threatened species, despite challenges by the state of Alaska and others seeking to strip the bear of its protection.
Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to protect the bear because of the melting of the Arctic sea ice was well supported and that opponents failed to demonstrate that the listing was irrational.
“Plaintiffs’ challenges amount to nothing more than competing views about policy and science,” Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote.
The polar bear was the first species added to the Endangered Species List solely because of the threat from global warming.
The status of polar bears became an issue in 2005 after the Center for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defense Council and Greenpeace filed a petition arguing that shrinking ice impaired the bears' ability to catch prey and could lead to their extinction. In December 2006, then-Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne declared the bears "threatened," rather than endangered and in imminent danger of extinction. Endangered and threatened species receive the same protections, such as protection of critical habitats, population recovery assistance and prohibition of harm to the species or its habitat. For threatened species, however, the government can reduce protections or allow exemptions.
If the bears were listed as endangered, new power plants could be blocked, as well as other sources of carbon dioxide and other gases that contribute to global warming. It also could make petroleum exploration more difficult.
The state of Alaska and hunting groups argued that the listing was unnecessary because the bear is protected by other laws.
“With the population of the species in decline, the needless hunting of them for sport must not be an option,” said Jeffrey Flocken, D.C. Office Director, International Fund for Animal Welfare. “As pro-trophy hunting organizations continue the fight to skirt existing laws and import polar bear trophies, today’s decision serves to reinforce the fact that the species is in jeopardy. The short-term special interests of hunting groups must never take precedence over long-term conservation efforts for the protection of polar bears.”
Currently, conservation groups are challenging Kempthorne's special rule in court.
“This decision is an important affirmation that the science demonstrating that global warming is pushing the polar bear toward extinction simply cannot be denied,” said Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute. “While we are disappointed that the polar bear will not receive the more protective endangered status it deserves, maintaining Endangered Species Act listing for the polar bear is a critical part of giving this species back its future.”
Studies show that rising temperatures are quickly melting the Arctic sea ice, forcing polar bears inland. In September 2007, scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey released a comprehensive nine-volume analysis of the science and reached a dire forecast: Two-thirds of the bear's habitat would disappear by 2050.
Polar bears are experts at hunting ringed seals and other prey on sea ice. But they are so unsuccessful on land that they spend their summers fasting, losing more than 2 pounds a day. Overall, scientists believe the global population of 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears remains robust. But virtually all polar bear experts predict rapid population declines in the Arctic, which is warming faster than anyplace else in the world, changing too rapidly for the bears to adapt and find another source of food.
RELATED:
Polar bear is listed as threatened species
Judge says U.S. must decide whether polar bears are endangered species
-- Ashlie Rodriguez (Twitter: @ashlierodriguez)
Photo: In this November 2007 file photo, a polar bear is seen outside Churchill, Manitoba. In October 2009, the U.S. announced plans to designate more than 200,000 square miles in Alaska as critical habitat for polar bears, a key step toward increasing protection for the threatened species. Credit: Paul J. Richards /AFP/Getty Images
Comments () | Archives (0) The comments to this entry are closed. var countNum = 0;if (countNum == 0) {jQuery("#archiveShow").css({'display' : 'none', 'visibility' : 'hidden'});jQuery("#commentsDivider").css({'display' : 'none', 'visibility' : 'hidden'});};jQuery('#fbShow').click(function () {jQuery('#commentsArchive').css({'display' : 'none', 'visibility' : 'hidden'});jQuery('#fbComments').css({'display' : 'block', 'visibility' : 'visible'}); });jQuery('#archiveShow').click(function () {jQuery('#fbComments').css({'display' : 'none', 'visibility' : 'hidden'});jQuery('#commentsArchive').css({'display' : 'block', 'visibility' : 'visible'}); });/*jQuery('#fbShow').css('color' , 'white');jQuery('#archiveShow').css('color' , '#666666');*/
L.A. Times on Facebook
AdvertisementIn Case You Missed It...The LatestMost ViewedMost Emailed Recent NewsTrash trucks fueled by 'trash gas': a growing trend | July 7, 2011, 2:12 pm »Victim of Yellowstone grizzly bear mauling was Torrance resident | July 7, 2011, 1:26 pm »Grizzly bear kills hiker in Yellowstone National Park | July 6, 2011, 4:11 pm »Light-brown apple moths: California deploys wasps as weapon | July 5, 2011, 2:57 pm »ExxonMobil attempts to limit oil spill on Yellowstone River | July 3, 2011, 4:45 pm »
Categoriesagriculture, food air pollutionalaskaandrew zajacarizonaashlie rodriguezautomobilesbettina boxallbiofuelsbookscaliforniacalifornia state parkscarol j. williamschinaclimate policyclimate sciencecoalcoloradodean kuipersendangered speciesenergy efficiencyenvironmental groupseryn brownfisheriesfood safetyforestsfuel cellsgeoff mohanglobal warminggreen buildinggreen jobshawaiiidahointernational invasive speciesjulie cartkenneth weisskim murphyland use and sprawllandfills and garbagelos angeles arealouis sahagunmargot rooseveltmarine mammalsminingmontanamovies and tvnational parksnatural gasneela banerjeenevadanew mexiconicholas riccardinuclear poweroceansoil and gasoil spillsoregonp.j. huffstutterpesticidespoliticspopulation growthportspublic healthpublic landsrecyclingrenewable energyrichard simonriverssolar energysusan carpentertechnologytiffany hsutony barbozatoxic substancestoxic wastetransportationtrees and plantsu.s. epaurban parksurban planningutahwashington statewater pollutionwater supplywildernesswildfirewildlifewindwyoming
ArchivesJuly 2011June 2011May 2011April 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010September 2010August 2010July 2010June 2010May 2010April 2010March 2010February 2010January 2010December 2009November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008
Stay connected:
About the ReportersBettina Boxall
Susan Carpenter
Julie Cart
Tiffany Hsu
Geoff Mohan
Kim Murphy
Margot Roosevelt
Louis Sahagun
Kenneth R. Weiss
More from The Times24 FramesAfterwordAll The RageAwards TrackerBabylon & BeyondBig PictureBooster ShotsCompany TownCulture MonsterDaily DishDodgers BlogFabulous ForumFrameworkGreenspaceHero ComplexHomicide ReportJacket CopyL.A. at HomeL.A. NowL.A. Times on TumblrL.A. UnleashedLa PlazaLakersMinistry of GossipMoney & Co.Opinion L.A.PolitiCalPolitics NowPop & HissReaders' RepresentativeShow TrackerTechnologyTop of the TicketTravel News & DealsVarsity Times Insider
Corrections Horoscopes Media Kit About Us Contact Us Site Map
Coastline Pilot | Daily Pilot |Huntington Beach Independent | Valley Sun | Burbank Leader | News Press |KTLA |Hoy | LA, Los Angeles Times Magazine | ZAP2itBaltimore Sun |Chicago Tribune |Daily Press |Hartford Courant |LA Times |Orlando Sentinel |Sun Sentinel |The Morning Call
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Los Angeles Times, 202 West 1st Street, Los Angeles, California, 90012 | Copyright 2011
A Tribune Web site
No comments:
Post a Comment